Monday, May 21, 2007

Raylene Richards Look Like

violin?


Before seeing this movie ("Perfect Stranger " or " Perfect Stranger " in English), the promotion done by the trailers and the repertoire of acotres (always leery of a movie with actors known and that there seems to be of high quality), I was not expecting too much, but I did not expect it to be the mess that was the truth.
But hey, what crap it is, you raise some points, thanks to the participation of Halley Berry, who as everyone may realize., Is divine (note, no better than Katie Holmes or Kate Winslet, my two platonic love). Besides being good, is a very good actress, and acted generally in a good movie. Can we consider that this is the worst he did?. No, because it's Catwoman, and do not think I can overcome this snafu.
On the other hand we have also reliable Bruce Willis, one of the few actors who I can respect even making action movies, because most of them are good (I saw "12 streets " I think the last of it, and I really liked. I have also received good comments "under threat", although I have not seen). "We are facing the worst movie of Bruce Willis?. I think so, because now I can not come to mind any of that size snafu made for him. Accept suggestions from you in the comments ...
Well, this movie is good Yankee, a very successful (Bruce Willis), a journalist who has very methods to urban or worse to make complaints and an investigation request made by a friend of hers to this man powerful because it supposedly had been such semienganchado with her, and as he was married he wanted to throw everything to hell, so this friend, full of anger, I wanted to publish this relationship. Oh, magically, some time after the request for investigation, the complainant mine dies. What's new about this in a movie of "suspense"?. Nothing. And nothing is what happens in the rest of the film. It's a whole series of investigations donkeys do not wear much. At least, in the film hit 3 headers, and more if you're half asleep. I'm sure if I had not seen in the movies, have been extinguished started the half hour.
I have to admit that the idea is not bad, but this has completely developed. Is one of those movies where the director thought of an idea and a final (supposedly unexpected). and did not know well that put him in the middle (there are several cases like that movie but not as bad as this, it is more, most are good, such as "master key", "no trace" "Soul Survivors", "Ghost Ship"). I dare say those are all good, especially the latter, are good, but are characterized by the failure to catch both during development and turn her head in the final. In this film, is not the case. Moreover, the director tries to espectadoi idiot, which does not allow you to weave their own hypotheses. It takes you a while, and when the end, simply count all in a flashback. In other words, it is not the same as the viewer and the characters become aware of things at the same time (ie, they had the same information and may have been intended by the viewer), that the character and have known it all before and start throwing little by little showing scenes we never saw. In short, poorly developed, and bad end, leading to say in general that is a bad movie.
I hope your comments make me very happy, and do not forget you have to go through life stepping charkas ... Because if you go to a charka, purifies you the shit you had walked past .... PISACHARKOS AGUANTE!


0 comments:

Post a Comment