Peel, Uruguayan film. We were good as regards Uruguayan films. I encanttaron whiskey, kennel, and the bathroom of the pope. Y truth, this movie will have much faith, for the idea.
I just liked the idea, I felt very good that someone will steal the idea occurred to another, and all that that entailed, especially if that person was dead.
But, how are we?. With anyone. But any evil.
I have to confess that the first half of the movie was very good and according to my expectations. He was in a good pace, leading the story more or less where I imagined I would go.
After just become director pires. In a search of haunted and no sense of character for the alleged idea, which make slowing the film go little by little until finally bore both you want to end at once. Pe appear
rsonajes and situations that do not contribute anything to the story. That is, if the fool who put the script hizop characters who bring something to the story. For the hell is the sister of the mad? To try to make us laugh with the fact that it becomes a deformed? Perhaps, but the truth in my opinion, fails. I have to admit that it is technically very good. It is very well filmed, the proceedings (including the Camarotta, especially after his death) are very good. The main character makes this mixture of coldness and sensitivity I guess the director looking into the character.
There are moments very well made. The technical resource of the camera in first person (ie, a camera showing as if the character was walking, as it somehow) is very well done. But the fact that a film is well done technically, does not mean it is good.
At times, though it may sound too aggressive, reminded me of "The blimp." Yes, the airship must be the worst movie of Latin American cinema (from Uruguay, insurance). "Shell" is not so bad, but it reminded me of the fact that "Che director:" What the hell did you mean by this? ".
Able to fault my expectations about how I thought it would be treated the film (I imagined a kind of black humor with regard to advertising, perhaps, that in fact there is but little, and in my opinion wrong), but I did not like anything.
To finish, the end. Not only is absurd and not very understandable, but we approach it seeks to-side philosophy. As the director said: "Fa, see how salty I said here with this final sentence, which is topped with a black background for you to stay thinking." But what we think? How we were more than 1 ½ hours waiting to finish it? Did you want us to laugh with the end? I overheard
that at the premiere, no one understood a damn, and that the director, to complete the film, gave a talk explaining the movie. It is said, the more muddied, he understood even less.
I repeat, is not so bad, it halfway bearable, but after getting boring, and eternal. Hopefully soon release a Uruguayan film to remember (such as "The Pope's Toilet", "25 Watts", "Whisky" and "kennel").
If you come down here you're a tolerant person re ... Few in the world are like you ... 
