Wednesday, October 24, 2007
White Dot On Facebook Chat
end
case, see a movie that I like and then is removed from the lineup. I spent it with "end Hotel." Yes, I know, no big deal, but met my 
and far exceeded expectations. What are you doing? A marriage is driving down the road, more or less fighting, and your car is left in the middle of nowhere, where there is a damn about a mile away (or miles, as they like to tell the gringos). Station Service is closed, oh coincidence! Well,
find a seedy hotelcito around, all dirty, and decide to stay. Begin to hear noises, knocks, sighs, etc. (JC if I keep getting seem synonymous), so they realize they are being watched and filmed. I think I have a big personal problem, I like movies that involve closure and other stressful situations to solve problems, even though such films are falling into repetition. Must be from the asshole of this kind (no suspense / terror, but locked-obscenities-solution of problems), but meets its goal of generating suspense tension, which has a
to plot more or less passable, without being a complete copy of any previous film in the genre. Clearly fall into certain cliches (jajaaaaaa, I am using a phrase commonly used by critics, that means the freaky groupismo is eating me! Obviously have to stop reading reviews out there). The performances are generally good, no sticks or so good or so bad, and I believe that the end is entirely appropriate to the story, though many people think
and that sucks. When he finished I said "perfect ending to this film (and then a sentence summarizes what happens, obviously I will not say not to burn everything). From what can be considered asshole movies thriller / horror yankees from which one can not expect much, I found the very best. Yes, I know, how can this movie came out the very best? Just look at the latest releases of the genre. Voices of more than 2? With the 1 did not realize that is the worst crap made in this genre? The only thing missing is that you leave the second part of "evil eyes", thanks to friends distributors do not hit theaters, and I had the misfortune to see it in my house.
Finally, recommended to pass time without thinking too much, having some tense moments but no major twists or strange things that leave you thinking in the end the fact that how could you be so asshole to not realize that before. I do not recommend to take a girl, because no scene too scared to embrace. Rather it is a lot of blood, and over parts where there are rats, so it is rather a film in which weighs the Asquith ...
If you come down here you're a tolerant person re ... Few in the world are like you ... 
Monday, September 17, 2007
Scholarship For Hetero Chromia Iridium
Hotel La Cáscara
Peel, Uruguayan film. We were good as regards Uruguayan films. I encanttaron whiskey, kennel, and the bathroom of the pope. Y truth, this movie will have much faith, for the idea.
I just liked the idea, I felt very good that someone will steal the idea occurred to another, and all that that entailed, especially if that person was dead.
But, how are we?. With anyone. But any evil.
I have to confess that the first half of the movie was very good and according to my expectations. He was in a good pace, leading the story more or less where I imagined I would go.
After just become director pires. In a search of haunted and no sense of character for the alleged idea, which make slowing the film go little by little until finally bore both you want to end at once. Pe appear
rsonajes and situations that do not contribute anything to the story. That is, if the fool who put the script hizop characters who bring something to the story. For the hell is the sister of the mad? To try to make us laugh with the fact that it becomes a deformed? Perhaps, but the truth in my opinion, fails.
I have to admit that it is technically very good. It is very well filmed, the proceedings (including the Camarotta, especially after his death) are very good. The main character makes this mixture of coldness and sensitivity I guess the director looking into the character.
There are moments very well made. The technical resource of the camera in first person (ie, a camera showing as if the character was walking, as it somehow) is very well done. But the fact that a film is well done technically, does not mean it is good.
At times, though it may sound too aggressive, reminded me of "The blimp." Yes, the airship must be the worst movie of Latin American cinema (from Uruguay, insurance). "Shell" is not so bad, but it reminded me of the fact that "Che director:" What the hell did you mean by this? ".
Able to fault my expectations about how I thought it would be treated the film (I imagined a kind of black humor with regard to advertising, perhaps, that in fact there is but little, and in my opinion wrong), but I did not like anything.
To finish, the end. Not only is absurd and not very understandable, but we approach it seeks to-side philosophy. As the director said: "Fa, see how salty I said here with this final sentence, which is topped with a black background for you to stay thinking." But what we think? How we were more than 1 ½ hours waiting to finish it? Did you want us to laugh with the end? I overheard
that at the premiere, no one understood a damn, and that the director, to complete the film, gave a talk explaining the movie. It is said, the more muddied, he understood even less.
I repeat, is not so bad, it halfway bearable, but after getting boring, and eternal. Hopefully soon release a Uruguayan film to remember (such as "The Pope's Toilet", "25 Watts", "Whisky" and "kennel").
Peel, Uruguayan film. We were good as regards Uruguayan films. I encanttaron whiskey, kennel, and the bathroom of the pope. Y truth, this movie will have much faith, for the idea.
I just liked the idea, I felt very good that someone will steal the idea occurred to another, and all that that entailed, especially if that person was dead.
But, how are we?. With anyone. But any evil.
I have to confess that the first half of the movie was very good and according to my expectations. He was in a good pace, leading the story more or less where I imagined I would go.
After just become director pires. In a search of haunted and no sense of character for the alleged idea, which make slowing the film go little by little until finally bore both you want to end at once. Pe appear
rsonajes and situations that do not contribute anything to the story. That is, if the fool who put the script hizop characters who bring something to the story. For the hell is the sister of the mad? To try to make us laugh with the fact that it becomes a deformed? Perhaps, but the truth in my opinion, fails. I have to admit that it is technically very good. It is very well filmed, the proceedings (including the Camarotta, especially after his death) are very good. The main character makes this mixture of coldness and sensitivity I guess the director looking into the character.
There are moments very well made. The technical resource of the camera in first person (ie, a camera showing as if the character was walking, as it somehow) is very well done. But the fact that a film is well done technically, does not mean it is good.
At times, though it may sound too aggressive, reminded me of "The blimp." Yes, the airship must be the worst movie of Latin American cinema (from Uruguay, insurance). "Shell" is not so bad, but it reminded me of the fact that "Che director:" What the hell did you mean by this? ".
Able to fault my expectations about how I thought it would be treated the film (I imagined a kind of black humor with regard to advertising, perhaps, that in fact there is but little, and in my opinion wrong), but I did not like anything.
To finish, the end. Not only is absurd and not very understandable, but we approach it seeks to-side philosophy. As the director said: "Fa, see how salty I said here with this final sentence, which is topped with a black background for you to stay thinking." But what we think? How we were more than 1 ½ hours waiting to finish it? Did you want us to laugh with the end? I overheard
that at the premiere, no one understood a damn, and that the director, to complete the film, gave a talk explaining the movie. It is said, the more muddied, he understood even less.
I repeat, is not so bad, it halfway bearable, but after getting boring, and eternal. Hopefully soon release a Uruguayan film to remember (such as "The Pope's Toilet", "25 Watts", "Whisky" and "kennel").
If you come down here you're a tolerant person re ... Few in the world are like you ... 
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)