chilly cinema, see "The Game of Fear 4." After what seemed marvelous 3, I generated a lot of expectations. The opposite happened to me with the 3 (the 2 I did not like much). Opposite happened here, my expectations were not filled. In that post, one of the first post of this blog, I was re forward to "The Game of Fear 3." It said that this movie had everything you need to have a third party to be good (history independent of the other 2, but in turn connected. Originality with respect to the other, and finally agreed to what was the whole story for the film).
In this case none of that happens, nothing. I have to accept that tore

Actually I thought that after the 2, could not achieve anything because I found it mediocre. But the 3 totally surprised me. That made him have great expectations to the 4, but did with the 4 which I thought were going to do with the 3: You were short of ideas.
Why say this? Both the 1, as in the 3 (and a bit in the 2 also, but the end kid is) the whole movie is designed to close with an ending that was intended from the outset and which the whole film were giving clues to close with something unexpected.
In the case of 4, not only the main story is pretty silly, but the end is ugly, almost meaningless. Not only completes what was the movie, but rather, if

only recommend them to be seen to see if they agree with this. So maybe I'm wrong and there are really terrible explanation of the end according to what was the whole movie and I did not realize.
Moreover, deaths are not even good. Are the least original of the whole movie. No plot twists made me cover my eyes as I had gone in earlier, so morbid or strived to generate.
What bag conclusion is that, first appeared those who wrote the original idea (or fart remember the name, I know that one of them is one of the major players in the 1, the photographer. If anyone knows his name is not Feel free to put in a comment) made the first pe

So I recommend you to look good standing, do not 5, because the 4 ruined everything.